I’ve seen a few VR180 creators on Reddit talk about turning their 8K footage from the Canon R5C into 16K. The examples I’ve seen do look better so I thought I’d try it out. I used Topaz Labs Video AI to upscale a 30 second clip that I shot while we on vacation in Guerneville, CA a couple of weeks ago.
It took about 26 hours (!) to upscale the video on my Mac Studio (M1 Max processor). I just used the default settings. I imagine I can get better results in the future. Here are crops from the original and upscaled video.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef070/ef070c9d5ceb6cd8bf1ead4a16334ab68fa7d099" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1aeae/1aeae593959a0c59b092f21985df96a5dc362db5" alt=""
The difference is more apparent when viewing them on the Apple Vision Pro. Try it out. Download the videos and view them in Spatialgen.
Along the way I learned a few things (thanks Mike Swanson!):
- MV-HEVC supports 7680×7680 per eye. So I upscaled my side-by-side, 8192×4096 video from the Canon R5C to 15360×7680.
- I used Mike’s Spatial video tool to create the MV-HEVC version but…
- My M1 Mac can only do 8-bit video at that size (the R5C video is 10-bit). I could have made an 8-bit version but that would have take A LONG TIME.
- Instead I processed the video on an M3 MacBook Air. M2 and M3 processors can do this size video in 10-bit or 8-bit.
- I tried various bit-rates for the 16K MV-HEVC file. The one above is 200Mbit/sec. It has slightly less compression artifacts than the 150Mbit file I made. I also tried 250Mbit/sec but players on my Vision Pro had a lot of trouble playing that back and it didn’t really look any better than the 200Mbit/sec file.
Given how long it takes to upscale video to 16K I’ll only be using this for special final projects. I do have a bunch of SD footage that I want to incorporate in immersive projects. Next I’ll going playing with upscaling that stuff to HD.